kragore: (Default)
For the people who were privy to the penis discussion at the St. Pat's party...

THIS IS NOT WORK SAFE.

It might also cause bleeding from your eyes/brain if you can't stand the idea of perverting delicate parts of your body to an extreme.

http://xo.typepad.com/blog/2006/03/the_giant_penis.html

Synchronicity

Date: 2007-03-18 11:57 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] wdonohue.livejournal.com
Even though I wasn't at the party, some resonance from it must have leaked all the way out to Chicago. At what was probably about the same time, I came across this while scanning through my usual blogs: (marginally NSFW)

http://www.headinjurytheater.com/article59.htm

A review of Doom Patrol #70 titled "Because Crotch-to-Air Missiles are Awesome." I just re-read it, to counter the effects of that... video.

-- Brian out --

Re: Synchronicity

Date: 2007-03-18 01:55 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] kragore.livejournal.com
BaHAHAHAHAHhahahaaa!

*gasps for air*

*peals into another fit of laughter...*

that.. is so... wrong, in so many fabulous ways...

I'm suprised they got that past the comic censors...

- K.

Date: 2007-03-18 04:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] motomuffin.livejournal.com
I... Um... Wow.

No, dude, you're not challenging anyone's thoughts about how penises should look or function; you're just a crazy person.

8-/

Date: 2007-03-18 09:18 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] kragore.livejournal.com
See, now that brings up an odd question - How does he think it's supposed to look/function? Because, by the sounds of it, it no longer functions as it was designed to...
He's an oddball all right...

- K.

Date: 2007-03-18 10:04 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] embermwe.livejournal.com
It certainly isn't particularly useful for the things *I* associate with being its primary functions...

Date: 2007-03-18 07:40 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] embermwe.livejournal.com
Yeah, I saw that in Nomad's journal before the weekend, and I hafta say it has haunted ne since... Wrong....just wrong...

Date: 2007-03-19 12:06 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] wyldehunt.livejournal.com
Ok, if a person had some gongenital defect, I can see them wanting to challenge the idea of a 'normal' penis relative to form. Function however is different. His is broken. Where's the challenge for the rest of us again? Oh, yes, to not make rude comments or laugh. Sadly, I have failed both. Mostly though, I just wondered why...

Date: 2007-03-19 12:33 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] kragore.livejournal.com
I guess I'm just modivated by the "why?".
As surprised as I am, I find the split interesting - We laugh at the man with a gorged one-eyed snake in his pants, but it's common practice for women to augment their bits and pieces, and place fleshy basketballs on their chests.

Humans are facinating and wierd, all at once...

(and yes, I laughed, after I scraped my jaw off the ground.)
- k.

Date: 2007-03-19 01:12 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] embermwe.livejournal.com
I suppose, but usually when a woman has "augmentation surgery" the bits still work for the intended purposes. I just am really haunted why someone would make their "happy fun equipment" into non functional performance art.

Date: 2007-03-19 03:28 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] wyldehunt.livejournal.com
IF it could still be used for its original function, I would laugh less. But unlike the fake breasts, which can still be used for nursing, and still look like breasts, his chubby monstrosity can not mark territory (function) or deliver his genes (also function). I was watching an interesting documentary that suggested the reason human females have larger breasts than other primates is the totally upright posture causes the eyes of mates to spend less time on the posterior. The cleavage of the bosom thus tries to emulate the roundness of the bottom, which from a purely reproductive view is closer to what males are after, especially considering only humans employ any position other than taking a female from behind (not argueing one way or the other on that as far as fun, just saying all other mammals just mount up). That might also explain why so many women have round breasts but flat butts. Evolution in action is a real bummer for non-breat guys. Anyways, breast augmentation is done usually to attract a mate or feel more 'confident' (military had a program to pay for boob jobs to make female soldiers more confident. That was the official line, but I don't know). In parting, a huge flacid penis is about as functional as a lard filled tube sock grafted to his groin. No function and very bad form makes it more than a little depressing. I suppose if he could get an erection it might be impressive, but as it is, it looks like a lazy shaved groundhog. And really, who finds those attractive?

Date: 2007-03-19 06:44 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] embermwe.livejournal.com
Flat butts come from lack of muscle tone and mass in that area, from sitting too much and moving too little. This would be easily
corrected, were someone so inclined, IMO...

Profile

kragore: (Default)
kragore

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 06:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios